Tag: foreign policy

  • Wrong and dangerous strategy: appeasing a bully 

    Wrong and dangerous strategy: appeasing a bully 

    Trump has turned Gaza into the set of The Apprentice: governments pay to sit in his boardroom over the ruins, and their only real job is to obey or get fired. Appeasing that is not strategy; it is complicity.

    By Amal Zadok

    Appeasing Donald Trump is not a strategy; it is complicity. Every time governments, institutions and political elites bite their tongues in the name of “stability,” they are not moderating him; they are underwriting his attempt to replace law with money, fear and his own ego as the organising principle of world politics. A man who combines the power of the U.S. presidency with the traits of a malignant narcissist, an obsession with personal “glory,” and open enablement of mass atrocities is not a “difficult partner”; he is a direct threat to any order that claims to be based on human dignity and the rule of law.

    Malignant narcissism is not mere vanity with extra hairspray. It is a configuration of grandiosity, lack of empathy, paranoia about enemies and a willingness to use cruelty to protect a fragile ego. In Trump’s case, this has meant delight in domination, compulsive lying, routine public humiliation of opponents and a chilling indifference to mass suffering, most starkly visible in his embrace of Israeli policies in Gaza and his political cover for a war that has devastated an already trapped population. For such a personality, other people’s lives and entire territories are props in his heroic narrative: if flattening a people or turning them into bargaining chips makes him look “strong” and pleases his base, then it is not a moral dilemma, it is an opportunity.

    The same pathology is visible in his maniacal fixation on the Nobel Peace Prize, and the humiliating spectacle of allies staging fake “peace” honours to soothe him. When a foreign leader like Marina Machado feels compelled to hand him a framed imitation of an accolade he never earned, it is not diplomacy; it is ritualised ego‑massage that tells every despot watching that even democratic politicians will debase themselves rather than confront his fantasies.

    This pathology is written all over his latest creation: the so‑called Board of Peace for Gaza. On paper, it is billed as a mechanism to oversee reconstruction and governance; in reality, it is The Apprentice metastasised to a global scale, with Gaza as the burned‑out set and whole governments auditioning for his favour. A $1 billion payment secures a permanent seat on this Trump‑chaired “board,” while poorer states are relegated to rotating spots, turning the future of a shattered territory into a billion‑dollar membership club. This is not multilateralism; it is monetised feudalism. It is “The Apprentice: Gaza Edition” – pay to get into the boardroom, sit around his table, follow his orders, and hope you are not the next one he effectively tells: “You’re fired.”

    The Board of Peace is also a direct attack on the UN‑centred system that, however imperfectly, recognised Palestinian rights and tried to put reconstruction under universal, not personal, authority. By dangling access to Gaza’s future as a perk for those willing to buy in, Trump is building a private mini‑UN in his own image: hierarchical, cash‑gated, unaccountable and centred on his personality. States that treat this scheme as just another diplomatic forum, rather than a frontal assault on multilateralism, are not hedging; they are helping him prove that you can sideline global institutions if you are ruthless and rich enough.

    None of this is accidental. Trump has begun saying the quiet part aloud. In a recent interview he declared that “my own morality, my own mind” is “the only thing that can stop me,” brushing aside international law and institutional checks as unnecessary constraints on his quest for “global supremacy.” For a man who has shown that his “morality” stretches to cheering bombardments, openly musing about annexations and threatening the use of force abroad, that line is not colourful rhetoric; it is a confession of megalomania. It tells allies and institutions exactly how he sees them: not as co‑equal guardians of a rules‑based order, but as furniture in a set he believes he owns.

    The Davos episode over Greenland and Canada completes the picture. Trump has openly pushed to “acquire” Greenland, tying tariffs and other economic weapons to the goal of securing “complete and total” U.S. control, before offering the thinnest possible reassurance that he will not, for the moment, use military force. He used a global stage to humiliate Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, sneering that “Canada lives because of the United States” and instructing Ottawa to “remember that” before daring to criticise his Greenland ambitions. This is not alliance management; it is hostage‑taking conducted in the language of reality television and mob protection rackets.

    His behaviour toward Canada and Denmark illustrates the pattern that runs from NATO capitals to Gaza’s ruins. Security guarantees, trade access and even basic recognition are treated as favours that can be withdrawn if insufficient loyalty is displayed. Tariffs are brandished like a baseball bat; territorial integrity is discussed as if it were a line item in a real‑estate portfolio; prime ministers are reduced to contestants he can dress down in front of the cameras. When allies respond with nervous laughter, cautious communiqués and private grumbling instead of coordinated pushback, they teach him exactly the wrong lesson: that they will swallow humiliation and coercion rather than risk open confrontation.

    Layer this onto Gaza and the result is grotesque. Trump is offering political and diplomatic cover to a campaign that has destroyed much of the strip’s infrastructure and displaced the overwhelming majority of its population, then presenting himself as the indispensable architect of what comes next. Under his plan, those who pay the price of his Board of Peace get influence; those who cannot pay get whatever trickles down. The people of Gaza themselves are spectators in a show supposedly scripted for their benefit. Their homes and bodies are reduced to scenery for a global audition in which states compete to impress the man who helped enable their destruction in the first place.

    Supporters will insist this is “hard‑nosed deal‑making” and a necessary way to get things done in a brutal world. That is precisely the illusion appeasement feeds. When governments attend his board, they legitimise the idea that the future of a devastated people belongs in a private club chaired by the man who cheered on their devastation. When media treat his “Board of Peace” branding and his “only my morality can stop me” line as colourful copy, they normalise the premise that checks and balances are optional extras in a nuclear‑armed superpower. When Canada, Denmark and other allies respond to tariff blackmail and annexation fantasies with little more than pained diplomacy, they validate his worldview that laws and treaties are decorations, not boundaries.

    The stakes extend beyond Trump himself. Autocrats and would‑be strongmen everywhere are watching. They see a U.S. president who tries to build a pay‑to‑play mini‑UN over Gaza, who declares that only his own morality restrains him, who bullies allies over territory and trade, and who still finds a line of states willing to buy seats at his table. If that behaviour is indulged, why shouldn’t they copy it? If the “leader of the free world” can treat international law as a suggestion and treat entire nations like contestants on a show, the message is clear: there is no real price for running the world as a personal franchise, so long as you are powerful enough.

    Refusing to appease Trump means more than tut‑tutting and diplomatic eye‑rolling. It means:

    -Boycotting and delegitimising the Board of Peace, insisting that Gaza’s reconstruction and governance be anchored in transparent, UN‑based mechanisms where seats are earned by responsibility, not bought with cash and flattery, and prosecution of those responsible for the genocide and war crimes in Gaza.

    -Responding to tariff blackmail, Greenland fantasies and open insults against allied leaders with coordinated economic, legal and diplomatic measures, rather than fragmented “concerns” that he can ignore one by one.

    -Treating declarations like “only my morality can stop me” as a mandate to reinforce external checks—courts, parliaments, alliances—not as a quirky line to be replayed on talk shows.

    Appeasing Donald Trump—appeasing his bullying, his megalomania, his reality‑show Board of Peace, his threats against allies and his contempt for law—is not prudence. It is surrender. Each time leaders choose silence over truth, access over principle or a paid‑up seat at his fake mini‑UN over a real fight for international law, they edge the world closer to a future in which power answers only to itself. A political system that wants to survive, and a world that wants to remain even minimally just, cannot afford the luxury of appeasing this bully any longer.

    References

    1.New York Times. (2026, January 18). $1 billion in cash buys a permanent seat on Trump’s “Board of Peace” for Gaza. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/18/world/middleeast/trump-board-of-peace-gaza.html[nytimes

    2.PBS NewsHour. (2026, January 19). $1 billion contribution secures permanent seat on Trump’s “Board of Peace.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/1-billion-contribution-secures-permanent-seat-on-trumps-board-of-peace

    3.CNN. (2026, January 18). Trump’s “Board of Peace” for Gaza to require $1 billion payment for permanent membership. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/18/politics/board-of-peace-gaza-trump-payment-membership

    4.The Atlantic. (2026, January 17). Trump’s billion-dollar Board of Peace. https://www.theatlantic.com/national-security/2026/01/trump-billion-dollar-board-of-peace/685671/

    5.The Wall Street Journal. (2026, January 19). Trump’s $1 billion-a-seat diplomacy club takes aim at the U.N. https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-1-billion-a-seat-diplomacy-club-takes-aim-at-the-u-n-2bccd9f9

    6.Business Times. (2026, January 19). What to know about Trump’s “Board of Peace” for Gaza. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/global/billion-dollar-membership-fee-what-know-about-trumps-board-peace-gaza

    7.PBS NewsHour. (2026, January 21). Trump’s Board of Peace is dividing countries in Europe and the Middle East. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/divisions-emerge-among-western-european-nations-over-trumps-board-of-peace-for-gaza

    8.The Hill. (2026, January 21). Trump to Carney: “Canada lives because of the United States.” https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5699148-trump-carney-canada-greenland/

    9.Global News. (2026, January 20). Trump says Canada “lives” because of U.S. https://globalnews.ca/news/11622445/donald-trump-mark-carney-davos-speech/

    10.Axios. (2026, January 21). Trump responds to Carney in Davos: “Canada lives because of the United States.” https://www.axios.com/2026/01/21/trump-davos-speech-carney-canada

    11.People Magazine. (2026, January 8). Trump says “my own morality” is “the only thing” stopping his global supremacy. https://people.com/donald-trump-says-morality-only-thing-stopping-global-supremacy-11881997

    12.Esquire. (2026, January 8). Trump says his “morality” is the only thing stopping him. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a69960918/trump-morality-in-check/

    13.New York Times. (2026, January 8). Trump addresses Venezuela, Greenland and presidential power in new interview. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/us/politics/trump-interview-power-morality.html

    14.CNN. (2026, January 20). Trump says Board of Peace meant to oversee Gaza reconstruction and security. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/20/politics/trump-gaza-board-of-peace-united-nations

    15.PBS NewsHour. (2026, January 19). News Wrap: World leaders weigh whether to join Trump’s “Board of Peace” for Gaza. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/january-19-2026-pbs-news-hour-full-episode

    ©️2026 Amal Zadok. All rights reserved.

    Subscribe and never miss an article!

  • Hijacked Democracy: How Israel’s Lobby Captured the Heart of America

    Hijacked Democracy: How Israel’s Lobby Captured the Heart of America

    by Amal Zadok

    For decades, the American public has been comforted by the illusion that they live in a functioning democracy, their interests safeguarded by a government built on checks, balances, and constitutional law. This myth is now unsustainable. At the root of America’s democratic decay lies not abstract forces or vague external pressures, but the concrete, multi-generational influence of Israel and its deeply entrenched lobby—an axis of power so effective, so persistent, that it has rendered the sovereignty, freedoms, and very essence of American democracy subservient to foreign interests.

    The Architecture of Power: How the Israel Lobby Seized Washington

    It is often said that nations are manipulated by shadowy external lobbies, but in the case of the United States, the Israel lobby stands alone as an unparalleled testament to foreign influence. From presidential palaces to congressional offices, AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and allied Zionist organizations operate with impunity. Their methods are no secret: targeted campaign finance, direct threats, networked media pressure, and legal intimidation. Israel’s coalition of advocates have, over decades, built the infrastructure that steers U.S. policy, not for the interests of American citizens, but for the priorities of Tel Aviv.

    This lobby co-opts both political parties. Presidential candidates, congressional hopefuls, senators, and state representatives are repeatedly forced into pro-Israel postures, whether they agree with the policies or not, simply to survive political fundraising and media scrutiny. Careers are built or broken by declarations of loyalty to the Israel agenda. The result is routinized production of legislation, executive directives, and judicial decisions specifically crafted to serve Israel’s security, military, and territorial ambitions.

    Elections Rigged and Freedoms Sold

    Nowhere is the corruption of democracy more evident than in the election process itself. Recent cycles have witnessed an exponential increase in pro-Israel donor spending, reaching nearly $45 million in 2024 alone—triple that of the past two cycles. This flood of cash doesn’t just skew outcomes; it warps the electoral agenda itself. Policy debates avoid mention of Palestinian suffering, Israeli war crimes, or the cost to American lives and treasure. Otherwise promising, progressive candidates who dare challenge the Israel lobby are eliminated—Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman just recent casualties of coordinated, high-dollar campaigns to silence dissent and preserve operational control.

    Even primary contests are infected, with Republican funding channeled through AIPAC and PACs to distort Democratic races and neutralize critics. Sitting members of Congress live with the constant fear that a single pro-Palestinian comment will spell the end of their careers, drowned out by a blitz of negative advertising, legal threats, and orchestrated scandal. In this climate, the sovereign will of the American people is an afterthought.

    Media Manipulation and the Death of Free Speech

    The Israel lobby’s ingenuity is most brazen in its campaign against American freedoms. Freedom of speech, once a sacred American principle, is now rationed by fear. Journalists, academics, artists, and activists face relentless blacklisting, doxxing, and direct intimidation if they dare raise Israeli abuses or support Palestinian rights. Larger outlets toe the party line, echoing AIPAC-scripted narratives; smaller, independent publications are bullied, derided, or driven out of business. Even social media platforms have come under pressure to shadowban, demonetize, or delete content exposing Israeli aggression or occupation.

    The highly public criticism and targeting of Tucker Carlson offer a powerful example of the methods deployed against voices that challenge the pro-Israel narrative in American media. As one of America’s most recognized commentators, Carlson has repeatedly raised uncomfortable questions about the U.S.-Israel relationship, confronted high-profile figures over unconditional support, and, most controversially, speculated publicly on intelligence connections and censorship related to Israeli interests in Washington. Following outspoken episodes questioning aid, alliances, and American militarism in service of Israel, Carlson has been the subject of one of the most orchestrated campaigns of public denunciation: widely accused of antisemitism, targeted for supposed conspiracy-mongering about Israeli intelligence activities, and relentlessly condemned for platforming perspectives critical of Zionism.

    The backlash has included professional threats, advertiser boycotts, media smears, and legislative scrutiny—reinforcing the chilling effect on other journalists who might otherwise raise critical questions. The controversy surrounding Carlson’s investigations and commentary is not simply a matter of contentious opinion; it is emblematic of how powerful interests shape the boundaries of public debate. His case demonstrates that even widely followed, well-resourced journalists are not immune from the machinery of suppression, which is activated at full force when criticism of Israel penetrates mainstream coverage.

    Anti-Semitism laws have become bludgeons, wielded to criminalize criticism of Israeli policy even when it’s couched in universally accepted terms. College students are expelled, faculty disciplined, and public institutions subject to invasive federal and donor oversight, putting a chill on all forms of pro-Palestine advocacy. The culture of silence is so complete that even moderate voices tiptoe around the real effects of the Israel lobby, lest they be erased from public discourse.

    Sovereignty Subjugated—America as the Proxy

    American sovereignty is now a theoretical construct, as Israel’s priorities dominate not just the foreign policy apparatus but the very laws that govern U.S. autonomy. Every year, billions are shipped to Israel in aid and military hardware, far exceeding assistance to any other nation, without meaningful debate or review. Arms deals flow not in response to genuine U.S. strategic needs, but in service of Israel’s ongoing occupation, with American troops and assets positioned globally to defend Israeli interests even at the expense of critical domestic priorities.

    U.S. presidents, regardless of party, regularly adopt Israel-centric stances and policies—moving embassies, vetoing U.N. resolutions, forsaking international law—all to maintain unshakeable loyalty to Tel Aviv. Legislation is routinely tailored for exemption: business partnerships, visa policies, and intelligence sharing all bend the rules for Israeli benefit. The influence goes well beyond policy: it festers within the military-industrial complex, federal law enforcement, and intelligence, often turning American resources towards defending Israeli aggression and suppressing dissent in the name of “security.”

    Suppression of Dissent and Criminalization of Solidarity

    Every campaign in defense of Palestinian rights faces ruthless legal, financial, and organizational sabotage. The Israel lobby leverages courts, legislatures, and executive branches to ban Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions actions; to punish protestors and organizers; and to marginalize—even criminalize—advocacy for Palestinian liberation. Constitutional protections for speech and assembly offer little protection in practice; the machinery of state, propelled by Israeli interests, now polices the boundaries of permissible protest.

    Dissent is not just discouraged—it is defined as anti-American. Police crackdowns on pro-Palestine protests, university discipline of activists, and congressional hearings to “defend” Israel all work to delegitimize solidarity movements. The message is clear: American freedom exists only for causes that align with Israel’s narrative, and dissent comes with direct, systemic consequences.

    The Cost of Subservience: What America Has Lost

    There is no single force hollowing out America’s democracy, sovereignty, and freedom more completely than the influence of Israel and its lobby. The cost to American lives, treasure, and the integrity of its institutions is incalculable. Democratic practice, once messy but vibrant, is now little more than a charade, with outcomes and debates determined in advance by distant interests. Sovereignty—once defended as sacred—is exchanged for subservience to an ally whose priorities increasingly diverge from the needs and hopes of most Americans.

    Meanwhile, rights and freedoms once taken for granted have become commodities—offered or withheld by political patrons, media barons, and the legal apparatus that arbitrates permissible dissent. The entire American system now operates in a permanent state of compromise, not to the advantage of its citizens, but in perpetual service to the Israeli state.

    The Uprising and Its Hard Limits

    Momentous change is afoot. As the depth and brazenness of Israeli influence is exposed, younger Americans and liberal activists increasingly reject manufactured consensus, challenging both the mechanics and morality of U.S.-Israel policy. Public opinion is shifting rapidly, with majorities of Jews and non-Jews alike questioning unconditional support for Israel and the machinery that enforces it. The bipartisan, uncritical embrace of Israel is cracking at its foundations. Progressive coalitions, united in their opposition to AIPAC, are rising—yet face the daunting task of dismantling the most sophisticated lobbying machine in American history.

    Legal countermeasures, media campaigns, and mass mobilization intensify—a battle not just for Palestinian liberation, but for the recovery of American democracy itself. Yet the Israel lobby, having mastered the arts of subterfuge and financial pressure, is unlikely to relinquish power without a fight. It continues to invest record sums, to target and destroy critics, to recruit media allies, and to manipulate the boundaries of what Americans are even allowed to debate. The struggle will be long and brutal, with many false starts and bitter defeats.

    Naming the Problem: The Essential First Step

    America cannot restore its democracy, its sovereignty, or its freedom until it honestly confronts the singular influence of Israel and its network of patrons. The problem is not abstract; it is present in every campaign contribution, every forced resignation, every murdered debate, and every law calibrated to benefit a foreign regime at the expense of national interest.

    Only brutal honesty, combined with united grassroots resistance and principled leadership, can begin the process of recovery. The first critical act is to name the Israel problem—without euphemism or self-censorship. Otherwise, the collapse will gather speed, and the last shreds of American liberty will be traded away.

    Soft coup in a progress? What to do?

    In light of these forces, we must ask: Are we witnessing, in real time, a soft coup d’état of the American government and its most valuable institutions—an upheaval not executed by tanks and generals, but by lobbyists, donors, and clandestine influence wielders whose loyalty is to Tel Aviv rather than Washington?

    Should this radical subordination of American sovereignty continue, the coming midterms may become not just another exercise in frustration for a disenfranchised electorate, but a flashpoint for collective reckoning. Will Americans, finally awakened to the theft of their democracy, rise to reject the capture and reclaim self-rule—or will they remain paralyzed, lost in a spectacle designed to obscure the true locus of power? The next ballot may not simply test policymaker popularity, but the strength of American identity itself.

    References

    1. Mearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. (2006). The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.

    2. Cleland, B. (2025, July 1). How Israel’s allies hijacked U.S. democracy. Independent Australia.

    3. Responsible Statecraft. (2025, September 2). Israel’s foreign influence is the most unrelenting in US history.

    4. Mondoweiss. (2025, November 11). AIPAC is suddenly a political liability. Is the Israel lobby in trouble?

    5. World New World. (2025, July 6). The Israeli State and Its influence on U.S. Foreign Policy.

    6. AMUST. (2025, June 28). The corruption of the American political system by Pro-Israel lobby.

    7. Arab American News. (2025, October 31). How pro-Israel advocacy built an influence machine in the West and what it cost.

    8. OpenSecrets. (2025, June 11). Pro-Israel Summary.

    9. UWA News. (2025, April 9). What is the Israel lobby – and why is it so anxious?

    ©️2025 Amal Zadok. All rights reserved.

    Subscribe and never miss an article!